All comparisons

PixDoc vs DocRaptor

DocRaptor uses the Prince rendering engine, which has limited CSS support compared to a real browser. PixDoc uses Chromium for identical rendering to what you see in Chrome, plus built-in screenshots and OG images.

Feature comparison

FeaturePixDocDocRaptor
SetupAPI key, one HTTP callAPI key, HTTP call
Rendering EngineChromium (what users see)Prince (proprietary engine)
CSS SupportFull CSS3, flexbox, grid, variablesGood CSS3, limited flexbox/grid
ScalingFlat-rate, auto-scalesPer-document pricing
TemplatesBuilt-in template engine with variablesNo template engine
ScreenshotsBuilt-in endpoint for PNG/JPEG/WebPPDF only
OG ImagesDedicated OG image endpointNot available
PricingFlat $29/mo for 5,000 renders$0.12/doc ($600 for 5,000)

Code comparison

See how much simpler it is to generate a PDF with PixDoc.

With DocRaptor

const DocRaptor = require("docraptor");

const client = new DocRaptor.DocApi();
client.setApiKey("YOUR_API_KEY");

const response = await client.createDoc({
  test: false,
  type: "pdf",
  document_content: "<h1>Invoice #1042</h1>",
  name: "invoice.pdf",
  prince_options: {
    media: "print",
    baseurl: "https://example.com",
  },
});

With PixDoc

const res = await fetch("https://pixdoc.dev/api/v1/pdf", {
  method: "POST",
  headers: {
    Authorization: "Bearer pd_live_...",
    "Content-Type": "application/json",
  },
  body: JSON.stringify({ html: "<h1>Invoice #1042</h1>" }),
});
const pdf = await res.arrayBuffer();

Ready to simplify your PDF workflow?

Start generating PDFs, screenshots, and OG images in minutes. No browser management, no infrastructure, no per-document fees.