All comparisons

PixDoc vs Playwright

Playwright is a powerful browser automation framework, but using it for PDF generation means managing browsers, handling concurrency, and building your own API layer. PixDoc handles all of that for you.

Feature comparison

FeaturePixDocPlaywright
SetupAPI key, one HTTP callInstall browsers + npm package
Rendering EngineManaged ChromiumChromium, Firefox, or WebKit
CSS SupportFull CSS3, web fonts, flexbox, gridFull CSS3 (same engine)
ScalingAuto-scales, no server managementManual: manage browser contexts and pools
TemplatesBuilt-in template engine with variablesNone — build your own
ScreenshotsSame API, PNG/JPEG/WebPSupported via page.screenshot()
Async / WebhooksBuilt-in webhook deliveryDIY queue and callback system
PricingFlat $29/mo for 5,000 rendersFree, but you pay for servers

Code comparison

See how much simpler it is to generate a PDF with PixDoc.

With Playwright

const { chromium } = require("playwright");

async function generatePdf(html) {
  const browser = await chromium.launch();
  const context = await browser.newContext();
  const page = await context.newPage();
  await page.setContent(html, { waitUntil: "networkidle" });
  const pdf = await page.pdf({ format: "A4", printBackground: true });
  await context.close();
  await browser.close();
  return pdf;
}

With PixDoc

curl -X POST https://pixdoc.dev/api/v1/pdf \
  -H "Authorization: Bearer pd_live_..." \
  -H "Content-Type: application/json" \
  -d '{"html": "<h1>Invoice #1042</h1>"}' \
  -o invoice.pdf

Ready to simplify your PDF workflow?

Start generating PDFs, screenshots, and OG images in minutes. No browser management, no infrastructure, no per-document fees.